Best Wireless HDMI Video Transmitter

To share this page via email, fill out the fields below:
Message Sent!
Oops! Please try again

If I were buying a wireless HDTV transmitter, I’d buy the $200 IOGear Wireless HD Digital Kit (GW3DHDKIT). This thing transmits 1080p video to a small receiver attached to your TV from up to a claimed 100 feet away.

Last Updated: November 11, 2014
Removed a former step-up alternative that was discontinued, updated the Other Products We Looked At section, and added a new runner-up choice, the DVDO Air3C, in case our main pick is ever out of stock or unavailable.
Expand Most Recent Updates
April 1, 2014: It's come to our attention that there might be a problem with the remote that comes with our step-up option, the Belkin Screencast. We are looking into this now and will update the guide once we have answers.
January 7, 2014: We added some information on a new multi-receiver setup from Iogear, which will cost $700 when it launches later this year. But that might be worth it if you really need to split the same signal wirelessly between 4 TVs. Read more about it in the What to look forward to section at the bottom.
October 28, 2013:

We tested IOGear's new wireless HDMI model, the $300 GWHDMS52 Wireless 5x2 HD Matrix. It's not for everyone: read below for why. While we were at it, we took the opportunity to revisit the category as a whole to see if there was anything else that could beat our current pick. Short version: there isn’t.

September 23, 2013: We're setting this to wait status while we check out IOGear's Wireless 5x2 HD Matrix transmitter.
January 8, 2013: IOGear just showed off a switching model of this transmitter with 5 inputs which is $400 MSRP and will probably be around $300 street. Consider it a step up model from this one, as it still is USB powered.

I base this on multiple professional reviews, plus my experience reviewing multiple HD transmitters myself. (On top of that, I’ve been reviewing AV gear for publications like CNET and Sound+Vision for over a dozen years.)

The IOGear transmitter base unit has two HDMI inputs and an HDMI output. This means you can have a TV, transmitter and sources (Blu-ray, cable/satellite box, etc) wired up in one room while wirelessly sending the same signal to another TV elsewhere in the house. In my testing, and in that of others, there is no appreciable decrease in picture quality, except at very long distances—and even then, it’s only noticeable on really large screens.

Perhaps my favorite feature of the IOGear is that the receiver unit can be powered using only a USB port (which is super convenient since most modern TVs have USB inputs). This means the IOGear can draw power from the TV without extra wires connecting to a power outlet. This makes it easy to hide and an effective alternative to cutting holes in your walls to hide cables. Amongst all the models worth considering, the IOGear is the only one that has this ability. In the off chance that your TV doesn’t have USB, the IOGear comes with a power adaptor too.

Who needs this?

The products mentioned here are for the wireless transmission of HD video and audio signals from an HDMI source to a TV. There are three main uses for a wireless HD product:

  • If your sources are in a different part of the room than the TV, you can send the signal wirelessly instead of running long cables across the floor (or under the floor, or along the baseboards, etc). This is an especially common problem with projectors.
  • If you want to mount your TV on the wall, you need to run power and HDMI cables. With wireless, you only need to run power to the TV. The signal from your sources gets sent wirelessly to the small receiver box. In the case of the IOGear, the TV itself can often power this wireless receiver.
  • If you want to have your sources and TV in two different rooms. Again, the IOGear is a good pick here because it is able to transmit through walls and has a “local” HDMI out, so you can have a TV in the same room as the sources, and a second TV connected wirelessly to the same sources.
  • If you have equipment specifically with HDMI outputs (Blu-ray players, cable boxes, Apple TV and Roku streamers, etc.). This is not for products like Chromecast, or any of the Miracast or WiDi products (which wirelessly stream content from tablets, phones, or laptops). Those are a different category, these are replacements for HDMI cables.

Keep in mind though, there is a cost to the convenience. Wireless is always going be more temperamental than wired, taking a few moments to sync up (connect) and potentially/occasionally dropping out.

What is this?

Readers Also Like

The Best Media Streamers

The Best Media Streamers

Cutting the cord? Here's what we recommend for streaming media from services like Amazon or Netflix.

Read More

A few words about all wireless HDTV solutions. Pretty much every wireless HDTV product will transmit up to 1080p video from whatever HDMI source you send it. This includes Blu-ray (2D and 3D), cable/satellite, and gaming systems. Most will also transmit IR signals, so you can control the source that’s attached to the transmitter (like your cable box) while you’re in the other room with the TV. The current crop of wireless products can handle all current and near-future HD video signals—although they aren’t guaranteed to be “future proof.” They won’t do Ultra HD 4K for example, but it’s going to be a long time before you have one of those TVs in your living room.

In my testing, there was no noticeable lag added to the system when using the IOGear. So gamers worried about their twitch skills shouldn’t be overly concerned with wireless. It is likely adding a tiny fraction of a second due to the encoding/decoding process, but it was less than what’s detectable using normal testing procedures.

The main differences between the various products on the market are the number of HDMI inputs on the transmitter, and the technology used to transmit the HD signal.

Warning! Jargon ahoy! There are two main standards for wirelessly transmitting HDMI signals:

  • WHDI operates on the lower 5 GHz frequency. This is higher than most Wi-Fi systems, so there is less chance of interference. It is also low enough in frequency to have decent performance through walls. The only drawback is that it requires a tiny bit of signal compression in order to function properly. But don’t worry: you won’t be able to tell the difference unless you’re using a huge screen over a long distance.
  • WirelessHD operates on the higher 60 GHz frequency. It’s able to transmit uncompressed HD video, but at the cost of reduced range and robustness.

It’s important to be familiar with these names because devices that use the same standard will function similarly to each other.

Take for example the DVDO Air, Vizio XWH200, and Rocketfish RF-WHD200. These (and others) all work on the WirelessHD standard and are capable of transmitting uncompressed video. Unfortunately, they only work when there’s no obstructions, such as walls or cabinets, between the transmitter and receiver. In other words, you’re out of luck if you want to place the TV in a different room from the sources. Worse yet, many cabinets will block the extremely high-frequency signal, so hiding your sources away in furniture won’t work either. In my testing, even walking between the transmitter and receiver can disrupt the signal. On the other hand, the IOGear uses the WHDI standard and is roughly the same price without those limitations. It’s a more reliable and better performer overall.

Models that use Wi-Fi, like the Actiontec My Wireless TV, are less common (and with good reason). In my testing I found the IOGear to perform a little better with less interference. Plus it has more HDMI inputs (and the USB power aspect). However, the ActionTec is one of the few solutions that allows you to add additional receivers, so multiple TVs in your house can all use the same sources. For most people, the IOGear is the better choice, but if multiple receivers seem useful to you, the ActionTec is worth checking out.

There are also other wireless technologies coming to market that aren’t yet widely available. For example, WiGig, or Wireless Gigabit, has the bandwidth to handle 1080p video (and then some). However, WiGig operates in the 60 GHz band, similar to WirelessHD, so it will likely have similar limitations.

Intel’s WiDi is built into laptops, and doesn’t have the anything-in-anything-out properties like the products here. It’s worth noting that if your laptop has an HDMI output, you can use one of these products to send the computer content wirelessly to the screen, though you’ll need to connect to the wireless transmitter via HDMI.

Praise for the IOGear

In his review of the IOGear and two WirelessHD products, Daniel Kumin from Sound+Vision said, “IOGear’s solution gets my pick as the mostest-for-leastest: best range, most functionality, nice ergonomics.” His only complaint was that it was a little pricy. But since his review, the price has been cut almost in half, which puts it in line with the WirelessHD products he didn’t like as much.

Mark Anderson from concluded, “If you’re looking to locate a TV or projector in a place where it would be hard to run cables, or want to connect a TV in another room to you main home theater, the IOGear Wireless HD 3D Digital Kit could be just the ticket. It just worked flawlessly in all of my tests.”

An incredibly talented writer for (who, coincidentally, looks just like me) gave the IOGear 4.5/5 stars. In a comparative test with three other wireless HD transmitters from an earlier review, he said of the IOGear, “Had the IOGEAR arrived in time to be a part of our initial review, it would have unquestionably won.”

Amazon’s average review rating is 3.8/5 from 76 reviews, one of the highest in the category. (The DVDO’s rating is 5/5, but with only 1 total review, this is suspect.) 46% rated it 5/5; 22% rated it 4/5.

Picture Quality, Distance, and Other issues

Like all current wireless HDTV solutions, the IOGear isn’t perfect. Though I had no serious issues during my testing, a minority of reviews reported problems with transmitting distances. Like the marketing for any tech product, take the claimed “100 feet” with a grain of salt. In my testing, I could get a decent image with the transmitter and receiver at opposite corners of my small house, but doing so resulted in a noticeable decrease in picture quality compared to a wired connection over the same distance. In my review for HDGuru I noted that “There was noise, a graininess to the image, most noticeable along edges and in fine detail. On a small LCD screen, this wasn’t apparent, but blown up [on a] 103-inch [screen], it was very noticeable.” I estimated it reduced image quality by 20-25%, but that it was only really noticeable on a really large screen.

Keep in mind, these factors are going to vary a lot on the size and construction of your house. My testing was on opposite corners of my house, through three walls. I was impressed it worked at all. That said, it’s unfair to expect any wireless system to work flawlessly at the maximum advertised distance, especially with walls in the way. Also, on smaller TVs, like 50-inches and below, it’s unlikely you’ll see a picture quality difference even at long distances. In the same room, the image was perfect.

One other issue is that IOGear only has two HDMI inputs, so it can’t be used as a central HDMI switcher if you have more than two HDMI sources (an A/V receiver or HDMI switcher would be better for that).

The Runner-Up

Also Great
DVDO Air3C 60GHz
This falls short of the IOGear, but it's the best product we’ve seen using the 60GHz technology.

The $200 DVDO Air3C is a reasonably priced competitor to our pick. It offers 1080p/60 uncompressed video and audio transmission, like our pick. However, it’s 60GHz, which means it will still have the same problems as the other products that work at that frequency range (namely, needing direct line of sight).

On the other hand, unlike most 60GHz wireless options, the Air3C’s receiver can run off the USB connection on most TVs. That’s big, and one of the main reasons we like the IOGear.

There’s only one HDMI input on the Air3 though, to the IOGear’s two. There’s also no HDMI local out like the IOGear.

Robert Heron did a great review at HDNation of 2013’s Air3 (starts about 3:40), which is basically the same (see the Other products we looked at section below). There’s even a moment where host Patrick Norton shows what happens when you block the line of sight (with a body, anyway).

So the Air3 is a good product, the best we’ve seen using the 60GHz technology, but it falls short of the IOGear in enough key ways that it’s not our pick. So for the same price we’re still recommending the IOGear. However, if the IOGear isn’t available (and you don’t need the step-up with its additional inputs), the Air3 works similarly (you just need line of sight, more or less).

A Step Up

IOGear has a Wireless HDMI model, the GWHDMS52 Wireless 5×2 HD Matrix, which at $300 is pricier than our current pick. It works basically the same as the old model, in terms of distance and picture quality. It uses WHDI technology, like our pick, and the receiver unit can be powered by your TV’s USB connection, also like our pick. But we can’t recommend it for everybody.

The difference is the transmitter now has four HDMI inputs, and one analog component input. Our pick has two HDMI and no component. Is this worth the $120 difference? Depends. If you don’t have a receiver for audio and HDMI switching, you have more than two sources (i.e. a Blu-ray player, an Apple TV, and a cable box), and want the simplest setup, yes.

However, you can get an HDMI switcher for around $20. Monoprice sells one for $25 ($19 on their site) that has three inputs. If you spend 90% of your time with two sources (cable box and Apple TV, say), this setup will save you $100. When you want to use the Xbox or other source, you would just have to switch sources on the HDMI switcher. It’s an extra step, but it saves you $100.

The Belkin Screencast, which also has four HDMI inputs, is $90 cheaper than the IOGear 5×2. However, the IOGear gets you HDMI out on the transmitter, and a USB-powered receiver with the IOGear. If you don’t plan on using the HDMI “pass-through” out on the transmitter (allowing for a TV in the same room with the transmitter and sources), and don’t care about a USB-powered receiver that can be powered off a TV’s USB connection, then the Belkin is the better and cheaper option.

Other products we looked at

2013’s remaining Air3s are currently priced around $120. We’re not sure how much longer they’ll be available. According to the company, the difference with the new model is “additional mounting options and lower price,” but wouldn’t specify what the additional mounting options are. Since they’re being blown out at a price even lower than the Air3C, that part isn’t an issue. The other big change is this year’s Air3C can run on USB power for both the receiver AND the transmitter. The Air3 needs a separate wall-wart for the transmitter. If you don’t want the IOGear, and you don’t need USB on the transmitter (powered from your A/V receiver’s USB connection, say), you can save some money with the older Air3, as they appear to be otherwise the same.

Iogear’s GWHDMS52MB Long Range Wireless 5×2 HD Matrix Pro should work similar to our pick, over more range. Plus it will let you stream uncompressed HD content to up to four different displays (with additional receivers). Since it’s $640 and specifically for longer range, we felt this was beyond the scope of this article.

Monoprice has a Wireless HDMI Extender for $141 ($133 on their website), which is cheaper than our pick. But it only has one HDMI input (the IOGear has two), and the receiver can’t be powered off the TV’s USB connection. If these two things don’t concern you, the Monoprice might be worth considering. It also uses the WHDI standard. I tested this product and found there was a little more noise in the image, and it didn’t work from quite as far in my house, but only by a few feet. The additional video noise is unlikely to be noticed on a normal-sized screen of 50 inches or less.

The Atlona LinkCast Wireless HD is an odd product. At first glance it seems cheaper than our pick, at $139. This is for one transmitter, and one receiver, which can’t be powered by the TV. If you want to add additional transmitters (one for each source, say, up to five total), they’re $115 each. You could do the HDMI switch type setup here as well, but, again, we feel the IOGear Wireless HD is simpler for most people — and cheaper if you want a multi-source setup without a switcher or receiver.

The Nyrius Home is no-go since it’s only HDMI 1.3, as in no 3D. Meanwhile, the Home+ seems to be the same product as the Monoprice (or more likely, the Monoprice is the same product as it). At $200 it’s more expensive than the Monoprice and our pick, despite having only one HDMI input. However, the Home+ adds USB transmission. This would allow the connection of a USB controller in one room (mouse/keyboard connected to the receiver) that would control a PC in another room that’s connected to the transmitter by USB and HDMI. This seems a rather niche use, so for most people we recommend saving your money and getting the IOGear.

The $400 Peerless HDS200 is significantly more expensive than our IOGear pick. It does offer two HDMI inputs, and two analog video connection options (component and composite), though. Unless you have analog video gear you still use like LaserDisc or Wii, you’re better off saving your money and going with the IOGear.

Peerless’s other product, the $230 HDSWHDI100, appears to be the same as the IOGear, with the addition of USB transmission. Like the Nyrius Home+ that also has USB transmission, this is only useful for people with a computer in one room that they want to control in another room.

The Belkin Screencast AV4 (F7D4516) was discontinued.

It’s worth mentioning again: if two products use the same wireless standard (WHDI in the case of most mentioned in this section), they’ll function very similarly.

Wrapping it Up

For most people, in most situations, I recommend the $180 IOGear Wireless HD Digital Kit. It offers the best combination of features, ease of use and wireless performance.

To share this page via email, fill out the fields below:
Message Sent!
Oops! Please try again


  1. Danny Kumin, Something in the Air: Wireless HDMI from Gefen, IOGear, and Vizio, Sound and Vision Magazine, April 3, 2012
    Wireless HDMI from Gefen, IOGear, and Vizio
  2. Mark Anderson, IOGEAR Wireless HD 3D Digital Kit Review,, July 2012
    "If you’re looking to locate a TV or projector in a place where it would be hard to run cables, or want to connect a TV in another room to you main home theater, the IOGear Wireless HD 3D Digital Kit could be just the ticket. It just worked flawlessly in all of my tests."
  3. Geoffrey Morrison, IOGEAR Wireless 3D HDMI Digital Kit- First Review,, December 11, 2011
    First Review, 4.5/5 Hearts
  4. Geoffrey Morrison, Do Wireless HDTV Systems Do The Job?,, November 22, 2011
    4.5/5 Hearts
  5. Chris Heinonen, Secrets of Home Theater and High Fidelity, Chris Heinonen, May 11, 2012
    Wireless HDMI Round Up
  6. Amazon User Reviews
    4/5 stars

Originally published: January 8, 2013

We actively moderate the comments section to make it relevant and helpful for our readers, and to stay up to date with our latest picks. You can read our moderation policy FAQ here.